Talk:Olympus OM-1/2/3/4

From Camerapedia.org

Some changes

somebody at minolta-forum.de complained about OM-3s descrition. Tried to brush it up

edited by U. kulick on May 5, 2006

I went forward in the same direction, with more details of the OM-3 and OM-4 metering system.

I only removed the mention of the OM-3 as a "popular camera". It is popular and desirable today, in the user / collector market, but at the time it did not sell well, while it was only a little more expensive than the OM-4 ($339 vs $300 in 1986 according to this page). --Rebollo fr 12:19, 6 May 2006 (EDT)

Reverted a mistake

This diff was adding a mistake to the page and I reverted it: both the OM-1 and OM-1n were designed for mercury batteries. The OM-1n was presented in 1979 and the mercury battery interdiction occured much later. --Rebollo fr 19:39, 20 June 2006 (EDT)